The NT File System is the most modern out of all three of the file systems available. It is the second most common, behind the exFAT, and is used by Windows and most flash drives. I am sure if you check your Windows computer you will see that the default file system being used is NTFS.
- Ntfs Or Exfat For Mac 2018
- Ntfs Vs Exfat
- Ntfs Or Exfat For Mac 2018 Update
- Ntfs Or Exfat For Mac 2018 Football
- Ntfs Or Exfat For Mac 2018 Holiday
So, basically I always format my removable mass storage devices as NTFS by default, but someone told me I was better off using exFAT. Now I've been looking around google, but can't find any good reasons why I should.
Is there anything that exFAT does (better) which NTFS doesn't which is useful when using it for (>4GB) removable mass storage?
BloodPhiliaBloodPhilia
8 Answers
Ntfs Or Exfat For Mac 2018
exFAT basically takes the FAT file system to the next level, adding a large amount of long awaited features that the FAT32 system was sorely lacking. One of the key features for people doing video editing is the support for >4GiB files and much larger partition sizes than FAT32 typically supported, making it much easier to work with modern multi-terabyte drives.
exFAT is available for Windows Vista, 7, and I believe I may have even seen a Microsoft release to make XP work with exFAT. There are some people working on Linux exFAT support, but I can't tell how far along they are, and as always, there is a risk of corrupting your data just like with NTFS..
From Wikipedia(my comments in bold):
- Scalability to large disk sizes: 64 ZiB theoretical max, 512 TiB recommended max, raised from the 16 TiB limit of FAT32 partitions. Note that the built-in Windows 2000/XP/Vista/7 can mount and support FAT32 volumes larger than 32 GB, but cannot create a FAT32 volume larger than 32 GB.
- Cluster size up to 32 MiB (allowing for larger partitions at the cost of more file slack)
- File size limit of 16 EiB (Limited by volume size), raised from close to 4 GiB in FAT32 (Better support for video editing and large archives)
- Free space allocation and delete performance improved due to introduction of a free space bitmap (much better performance than FAT32)
- Support for access control lists (so you can control file access if you want but I suspect the main use would be for USB devices where you just want people to access it go figure..)
- Provision for OEM-definable parameters to customize the file system for specific device characteristics (for use in embedded devices with specific needs)
What Microsoft developers have basically done is update the FAT32 file system to exFAT, moving from 32-bit addressing to 64-bit addressing, to offer an improved speed alternative over moving to NTFS at the same time making it possible to create, store or transfer huge files, files greater than 4GiB. In theory, exFAT does not have as much of the operational overhead of NTFS as it lacks many features that add complexity (and therefore processing time and disk latency) to the filesystems.
Some of the missing (and effectively useless or a waste for removable media) features include:
The only drawbacks to exFAT are that Microsoft has not released it into the public, requiring that companies licence it for use on their devices. This is likely more aimed at digital video recorder type devices, home users get a licence to use it with Windows.
From exFAT Versus FAT32 Versus NTFS
However, exFAT should be a true competitor to NTFS on systems with limited processing power and memory. NTFS on flash memory has been known to be inefficient for quite some time. exFAT’s smaller footprint/overhead makes it ideal for this purpose. Of course, only if your definition of “ideal” allows software to be proprietary and not open source.
Mokubai♦Mokubai
As an addendum to the above answers, exFAT is also supported by OS X Snow Leopard in 10.6.5 and later (although not mentioned in the release notes).
One very important difference comes about if you use the EFS 'Encrypted' attribute (EFS stands for Encrypting File System, which is not actually a file system, but rather a feature of NTFS).
Most of the time, EFS is transparent. You don't see it. Files are encrypted on the disk, but are automatically decrypted when you access them.
When you copy an encrypted file to another NTFS volume, it stays encrypted using the same key(s) the original was. This can be great, and this can also be incredibly annoying, depending on your use case.
Basically, if you want to take your files to another computer that has all the same decryption certificates installed, choose NTFS on the removable drive. Then your files stay encrypted in transit, yet are transparently accessible on all authorized computers. Neat-o!
However, if you usually take files to machines that don't have the decryption certificates, there is no way to tell Windows to automatically decrypt a file when it's copied to an external disk. If you forget to manually decrypt it, you won't be able to access it on the other machine. If you do this often, choose exFAT on the removable drive. Any files you copy to it will then get decrypted automatically, on the fly.
If you don't use EFS (like almost everybody, ever) then obviously this doesn't apply. I think this is the second biggest difference after 'compatibility with other OSes'.
RomanStRomanSt
Interoperability of the file system is important. exFAT is also natively, read/write supported by OS X Snow Leopard in 10.6.5 and later (although not mentioned in the release notes). This can be verified by checking Disk Utility, where exFAT is an option for formatting.
On OS X, NTFS is still considered Read only, unless you modify the fstab on a per drive basis and are willing to deal with non-native mounting. As such, it's not a reliable option for most users.
While using your drive on a Mac or Linux or other system might not be your main concern, it is something to consider.
NTFS has security attributes that get tied to the local computer by default - so for media that needs to move around, FAT is usually more handy.
NTFS has journaling which helps ensure the file system can recover from corruption, whereas exFAT does not. So if you use the drive only from Windows PCs and reliability and data integrity are important, such as for archival or backup purposes, NTFS should be used over exFAT.
Source (then are many other sources with the same kind of information)
In our opinion, there’s only one real “not so positive” thing about exFAT, and that’s the lack of support for journaling. Journaling is a feature that allows the file system to keep records of changes made to files stored on it. That’s useful when data corruption occurs because journals can be used to recover broken data. exFAT doesn’t have this feature, and that means that data can be corrupted more easily when unexpected shutdowns occur or when the removable drive formatted this way is not safely ejected.
LaurentLaurent
Google's many results seem to suggest it's much better for many reasons (it's newer, the same old reasons like smaller, faster, more efficient) but also less compatible, Vista and 7 only.
This is the best I found, chart explains a lot.
tobylanetobylane
One practical advantage that NTFS still has over exFat though is that the max length of volume label in exFat is still only 11 bytes (like in FAT) but its 32 bytes in NTFS.
Ntfs Vs Exfat
This can be helpful when you have multiple USBs of same brands and you want to create different names to identify each.
As an example, my typical volume names for say a verbatim drive that is 256 GB is verbatim256. Now if I have a second drive of the same type, I can't even add 1 or 2 to the name because it has already reached max limit.
This is actually deciding factor for me to stick to NTFS as they both otherwise work near universally.
zarzar
protected by Community♦Feb 9 '13 at 15:57
Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged ntfsstorageexfatexternal-drive or ask your own question.
It is not an easy thing to transfer files between Windows and Mac, especially when our external drive is formatted as NTFS. By default, macOS Mojave 10.14, High Sierra 10.13 and earlier can read NTFS drive but can't write to it. With reliableNTFS for Mac apps, we can read and write to NTFS drive as we wish, including creating, modifying, transferring and deleting files on NTFS drive.
There are many apps claim to be the best NTFS apps for macOS Mojave 10.14/High Sierra 10.13. After careful comparison, we have found the top 7 NTFS for macOS Mojave 10.14/High Sierra 10.13 apps and will give the detailed pros and cons of them. For users who are looking for reliable NTFS for macOS Mojave 10.14/High Sierra 10.13 apps, this passage can be very helpful.
Best NTFS for Mac Apps - Write NTFS Drives on macOS Mojave/High Sierra
No.1. iBoysoft Drive Manager
iBoysoft Drive Manager is a professional Mac tool that can automatically and effectively mount NTFS drive on Mac as a regular drive with read-write mode. It supports macOS Mojave 10.14/High Sierra 10.13/10.12 and macOS 10.11/10.10/10.9/10.8/10.7.
Best NTFS for Mac - iBoysoft Drive Manager
- Read and write NTFS on Mac
- Mount and unmount external drives
- Map network drives as local drives
- Safely eject external drives on Sleep mode
- Manage multiple drives with one-click
- Support macOS 10.14/10.13/10.12 and OS X 10.11/10.10/10.9/10.8/10.7
iBoysoft Drive Manager is also a handy tool to manage external drives and network drives. If offers a menu bar from which we can easily mount, unmount and remount network drives, external hard drive, USB flash drive, SD card, memory card, CF card, pen drive, etc.
Pros:
1. Not only can enable write to NTFS drives, but also can mount FAT32 drives, exFAT drives, etc.
Ntfs Or Exfat For Mac 2018 Update
2. Extra function: mount/unmount network drives and external drives with ease.
Step-by-step instruction to mount NTFS drive on macOS High Sierra 10.13 with iBoysoft Drive Manager
Step 1: Free download and install iBoysoft Drive Manager on Mac.
Step 2: Launch iBoysoft Drive Manager and connect NTFS drive to Mac.
Step 3: Write to NTFS drive after getting notified that the NTFS drive has been mounted successfully.
No.2. NTFS Assistant
Ntfs Or Exfat For Mac 2018 Football
NTFS Assistant is also a good choice to enable write to NTFS drive on macOS High Sierra 10.13. It is specially designed to help mount NTFS drive on Mac with read-write mode. It gives us full control over NTFS drive that we connect to Mac.
Pros:
Quicken for mac 2018 download historical data. Quicken 2019 for Windows imports data from Quicken for Windows 2010 or newer, Microsoft Money 2008 and 2009 (for Deluxe and higher). Quicken 2019 for Mac imports data from Quicken for Windows 2010 or newer, Quicken for Mac 2015 or newer, Quicken for Mac 2007, Quicken Essentials for Mac.
1. It only sales at a low price and is very cost-efficient.
2. Fully compatible with macOS 10.14/10.13/10.12 and Mac OS X 10.11/10.10/10.9/10.8/10.7.
3. Simple to install and easy to use.
The Wirecutter has put the C920 through the paces year after year and still believe it’s the best option available. “This webcam had the best image quality of the five webcams we tested, and it produced sharp, 1080p-resolution video both locally and streamed through video services such as Skype, Google Hangouts, and Zoom. Best webcams for mac 2018. Home » The Best » Best Webcams for Mac: Make Your Choice. Best Webcams for Mac: Make Your Choice. March 28, 2018. Looking for such an important item of the accessories for Mac fans as a decent webcam to enhance your streaming or for other purposes? With a price tag that sits well under $30, the webcam will appeal to those that will not necessary want to spend an exponential sum on a webcam for their Mac. But the best thing about the Logitech C310 is that offers more or less the same quality as the C615. If you're looking for an external webcam to enhance your streaming, chatting, or conference call, we have the solution. Whether you want the best webcam that money can buy or prefer a low-cost option, we've rounded up some of the best webcams you can find for your Mac. The Logitech C920 is the best.
Tutorial to download and use NTFS Assistant:
Step 1: Download and install NTFS Assistant fromApp Store >>.
Step 2: Download and install NTFS Assistant Helper >>.
Step 3: Launch NTFS Assistant and connect NTFS drive to Mac.
No.3. Paragon NTFS for Mac 15
Paragon NTFS for Mac 15 is a file system driver that allows macOS Yosemite and later (including macOS High Sierra) to read and write to NTFS hard drives, NTFS solid-state storage devices, and NTFS USB flash drives.
Paragon NTFS for Mac offers options to enable Spotlight indexing, mount disks read-only, or disable auto-mount on a per-volume basis.
Pros:
1. Fast, native read/write access for NTFS drives.
2. Optional menu bar app with mount/unmount controls.
Cons:
1. Paid major upgrades: It is free to have a minor upgrade. But for major upgrades (like from version 14 to version 15), we have to pay for that.
2. macOS 10.8 Mountain Lion or earlier requires NTFS for Mac 12.
No.4. Tuxera NTFS for Mac
Tuxera NTFS for Mac is a commercial NTFS drive developed from a popular open-source software named NTFS-3G. It has been designed to bring customers the most efficient performance when accessing NTFS drives while keeping their data safe.
Pros:
1. Tuxera NTFS for Mac is compatible with popular virtulization and encryption softwares, like Parallels Desktop, VMware Fusion and TrueCrypt.
2. It supports 15 languages, including English, Chinese, French, Japanese, Korean, Spanish.
Cons:
1. Slow speed: Tuxera NTFS for Mac only has slow speed when transferring big files and large volume data.
2. Relatively high price: The lifetime license of Tuxera NTFS for Mac charges US$31.
No.5. Mounty for Mac
Mounty for Mac is a smooth-running Mac application specially designed to help mount write-protected NTFS volumes in read-write mode on Mac.
Pros:
1. Mounty for Mac is a free software, so we needn't spend any money to buy it.
2. Easy to install and use.
Cons:
1. From feedback of many users, Mounty for NTFS can only write to NTFS drive with slow speed.
2. Since it is a freeware, it has no technical support.
No.6. FUSE for macOS
Ntfs Or Exfat For Mac 2018 Holiday
FUSE for macOS (was OSXFUSE) allows us to extend macOS's native file-handling capabilities via third-party file systems. It is a successor of MacFUSE, which is no longer being maintained.
Pros:
1. User friendly installation procedure.
2. Wide collection of user space libraries designed to provide support for multiple languages.
Cons:
It has some bugs, such as file size being reported as 0 bytes when using the file modules.
NO.7. SL-NTFS
SL-NTFS makes us able to write on NTFS partition via Apple driver. After installing SL-NTFS, we will be notified once a NTFS disk (USB or External HDD) is mounted and be asked to enable write to NTFS function if it is not set automatically.
Pros:
It is easy to install and is a freeware.
Cons:
1. Limited to access large number of files and large volume of data.
2. Does not support completely all hard driver brands.